Bank Comparison
Altamaha Bank and Trust Company vs New Carlisle Federal Savings Bank
Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.
vs
18 · 5
winning metrics across 23 comparable rows
Capital adequacy
| Metric | Altamaha Bank and Trust Company | New Carlisle Federal Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio | 12.55% | 9.42% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio | 12.55% | 9.42% |
| Total Capital Ratio | 13.16% | 10.21% |
| Tier 1 Leverage Ratio | 9.97% | 8.17% |
| Equity / Assets | 8.56% | 8.06% |
Profitability
| Metric | Altamaha Bank and Trust Company | New Carlisle Federal Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 1.52% | 0.92% |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 17.92% | 11.39% |
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 4.62% | 3.75% |
| Yield on Earning Assets | 6.31% | 6.36% |
| Cost of Funds | 1.78% | 2.80% |
Asset quality
| Metric | Altamaha Bank and Trust Company | New Carlisle Federal Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Texas Ratio | 2.01% | 16.65% |
| Non-Performing Loan Ratio | 0.24% | 1.60% |
| Non-Performing Asset Ratio | 0.18% | 1.38% |
| Net Charge-Off Ratio | 3.75% | 0.04% |
| ACL / Loans | 0.63% | 0.78% |
Balance sheet
| Metric | Altamaha Bank and Trust Company | New Carlisle Federal Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | $329,690K | $329,841K |
| Total Deposits | $300,804K | $265,495K |
| Total Loans | $251,807K | $284,235K |
| Total Equity | $28,220K | $26,585K |
| Net Income (quarter) | $1,271K | $748 |
Liquidity & funding
| Metric | Altamaha Bank and Trust Company | New Carlisle Federal Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio | 83.71% | 107.06% |
| Core Deposit Ratio | 91.45% | 88.17% |
| Uninsured Deposit Ratio | — | — |
Identity
| Metric | Altamaha Bank and Trust Company | New Carlisle Federal Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters City | VIDALIA | NEW CARLISLE |
| Headquarters State | GA | OH |
| Asset Tier | Small | Small |
| Charter Class | 0 | 703043 |
| Regulator | FDIC | OCC |
| Domestic Branches | 4 | 3 |
| Employees (FTE) | 51 | 29 |
| Established | May 16, 1966, midnight | Jan. 1, 1883, midnight |
About this comparison
All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings — the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of . The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio.
View full Altamaha Bank and Trust Company profile | View full New Carlisle Federal Savings Bank profile | Browse all bank comparisons