Risk Screeners
US Bank Risk Screeners
5 rankings of every FDIC-insured US bank by the supervisory risk metrics that regulators actually use in CAMELS reviews. Each screener cites the FFIEC schedule it draws from and frames every value against published Interagency Guidance thresholds, with no proprietary letter grades. Every screener ranks call report data as of Q2 2026 ().
Prospect screeners
Lists for loan buyers, property buyers, consultants and vendors: banks whose nonaccrual loans are rising in a portfolio, and banks holding foreclosed real estate. Each one downloads as a CSV on Pro. How vendors and note buyers use them.
Why these specific screeners?
Each of these metrics has been at the center of a US bank failure cycle over the past three-plus decades. CRE concentration and construction concentration were the leading-loss-severity exposures in the 1990s S&L crisis and the 2008–2011 GFC failure wave. Uninsured deposit ratio and AOCI burden are the two metrics whose combination drove the 2023 regional bank failures (Silicon Valley Bank and Signature in March, First Republic on May 1). Each was widely cited after the fact; these screeners surface them before, with current quarterly data. Agricultural lending concentration is the exposure behind the mid-1980s farm-bank failures, when farmland values and farm income fell together; it remains the defining risk of community banks across the Farm Belt.
Sourced from the most recent FFIEC call report filing for every active FDIC-insured US bank, refreshed each quarter as new filings are processed. For the full metric definitions, see the banking metrics glossary; for the underlying call-report schedules, see the call report explainer.