Bank Comparison
Bath Savings Institution vs Quill Bank
Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.
vs
10 · 11
winning metrics across 21 comparable rows
Capital adequacy
| Metric | Bath Savings Institution | Quill Bank |
|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio | — | 16.08% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio | — | 16.08% |
| Total Capital Ratio | — | 17.36% |
| Tier 1 Leverage Ratio | 15.49% | 13.92% |
| Equity / Assets | 14.36% | 13.25% |
Profitability
| Metric | Bath Savings Institution | Quill Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 0.06% | 5.25% |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 0.40% | 37.13% |
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 2.95% | 16.76% |
| Yield on Earning Assets | 4.59% | 19.60% |
| Cost of Funds | 1.88% | 3.11% |
Asset quality
| Metric | Bath Savings Institution | Quill Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Texas Ratio | 0.56% | 17.50% |
| Non-Performing Loan Ratio | 0.14% | 3.66% |
| Non-Performing Asset Ratio | 0.08% | 2.85% |
| Net Charge-Off Ratio | 0.00% | 6.79% |
| ACL / Loans | 1.39% | 4.16% |
Balance sheet
| Metric | Bath Savings Institution | Quill Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | $1,499M | $1,504M |
| Total Deposits | $1,161M | $1,282M |
| Total Loans | $875,923K | $1,171M |
| Total Equity | $215,352K | $199,370K |
| Net Income (quarter) | $217 | $18,737K |
Liquidity & funding
| Metric | Bath Savings Institution | Quill Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio | 75.45% | 91.35% |
| Core Deposit Ratio | 89.67% | 70.92% |
| Uninsured Deposit Ratio | 47.81% | 25.23% |
Identity
| Metric | Bath Savings Institution | Quill Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters City | BATH | PROVO |
| Headquarters State | ME | UT |
| Asset Tier | 4: $1B-10B | 4: $1B-10B |
| Charter Class | 0 | 0 |
| Regulator | FDIC | FDIC |
| Domestic Branches | 13 | 7 |
| Employees (FTE) | 176 | 248 |
| Established | April 19, 1852, midnight | July 29, 1993, midnight |
About this comparison
All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings — the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of March 31, 2026. The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio.
View full Bath Savings Institution profile | View full Quill Bank profile | Browse all bank comparisons