Skip to main content

Bank Comparison

Dedham Institution for Savings vs Colorado Federal Savings Bank

Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.

Dedham Institution for Savings

RSSD 193809 · DEDHAM, MA

Full profile →

vs

13 · 11

winning metrics across 24 comparable rows

Colorado Federal Savings Bank

RSSD 1718469 · GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO

Full profile →

Capital adequacy

MetricDedham Institution for SavingsColorado Federal Savings Bank
CET1 Ratio 13.83% 16.03%
Tier 1 Capital Ratio 13.83% 16.03%
Total Capital Ratio 14.61% 16.87%
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio 11.21% 9.94%
Equity / Assets 10.94% 9.98%

Profitability

MetricDedham Institution for SavingsColorado Federal Savings Bank
Return on Assets (ROA) 0.32% 0.26%
Return on Equity (ROE) 2.93% 2.62%
Net Interest Margin (NIM) 2.83% 1.92%
Yield on Earning Assets 4.94% 4.91%
Cost of Funds 2.36% 3.22%

Asset quality

MetricDedham Institution for SavingsColorado Federal Savings Bank
Texas Ratio 7.14% 4.03%
Non-Performing Loan Ratio 0.67% 0.62%
Non-Performing Asset Ratio 0.81% 0.42%
Net Charge-Off Ratio 0.00% 0.00%
ACL / Loans 0.77% 0.78%

Balance sheet

MetricDedham Institution for SavingsColorado Federal Savings Bank
Total Assets $2,576M $2,577M
Total Deposits $2,049M $1,506M
Total Loans $1,998M $1,733M
Total Equity $281,944K $257,356K
Net Income (quarter) $2,057K $1,688K

Liquidity & funding

MetricDedham Institution for SavingsColorado Federal Savings Bank
Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 97.50% 115.08%
Core Deposit Ratio 89.57% 90.62%
Uninsured Deposit Ratio 42.81% 9.49%

Identity

MetricDedham Institution for SavingsColorado Federal Savings Bank
Headquarters City DEDHAM GREENWOOD VILLAGE
Headquarters State MA CO
Asset Tier Large Large
Charter Class 0 708876
Regulator FDIC OCC
Domestic Branches 15 1
Employees (FTE) 215 75
Established March 19, 1831, midnight June 29, 1990, midnight

About this comparison

All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings — the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of . The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio.

View full Dedham Institution for Savings profile  |  View full Colorado Federal Savings Bank profile  |  Browse all bank comparisons