Skip to main content

Bank Comparison

Farmers Trust and Savings Bank vs Chelsea Savings Bank

Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.

Farmers Trust and Savings Bank

RSSD 382443 · WILLIAMSBURG, IA

Full profile →

vs

11 · 9

winning metrics across 20 comparable rows

Chelsea Savings Bank

RSSD 771748 · BELLE PLAINE, IA

Full profile →

Capital adequacy

MetricFarmers Trust and Savings BankChelsea Savings Bank
CET1 Ratio
Tier 1 Capital Ratio
Total Capital Ratio
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio 22.31% 16.20%
Equity / Assets 21.92% 11.59%

Profitability

MetricFarmers Trust and Savings BankChelsea Savings Bank
Return on Assets (ROA) 2.72% 1.63%
Return on Equity (ROE) 12.48% 15.15%
Net Interest Margin (NIM) 4.32% 3.35%
Yield on Earning Assets 5.68% 4.74%
Cost of Funds 1.73% 1.59%

Asset quality

MetricFarmers Trust and Savings BankChelsea Savings Bank
Texas Ratio 1.32% 0.92%
Non-Performing Loan Ratio 0.35% 0.26%
Non-Performing Asset Ratio 0.29% 0.11%
Net Charge-Off Ratio -0.01% 0.00%
ACL / Loans 0.41% 0.72%

Balance sheet

MetricFarmers Trust and Savings BankChelsea Savings Bank
Total Assets $198,353K $198,252K
Total Deposits $152,442K $174,458K
Total Loans $147,849K $81,525K
Total Equity $43,477K $22,969K
Net Income (quarter) $1,345K $849

Liquidity & funding

MetricFarmers Trust and Savings BankChelsea Savings Bank
Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 96.99% 46.73%
Core Deposit Ratio 95.94% 86.95%
Uninsured Deposit Ratio

Identity

MetricFarmers Trust and Savings BankChelsea Savings Bank
Headquarters City WILLIAMSBURG BELLE PLAINE
Headquarters State IA IA
Asset Tier Small Small
Charter Class 0 0
Regulator FDIC FDIC
Domestic Branches 2 5
Employees (FTE) 14 25
Established Jan. 1, 1934, midnight Oct. 19, 1936, midnight

About this comparison

All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings — the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of . The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio.

View full Farmers Trust and Savings Bank profile  |  View full Chelsea Savings Bank profile  |  Browse all bank comparisons