Bank Comparison
Insouth Bank vs Eastern Michigan Bank
Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.
vs
6 · 17
winning metrics across 23 comparable rows
Capital adequacy
| Metric | Insouth Bank | Eastern Michigan Bank |
|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio | 10.12% | 17.12% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio | 10.12% | 17.12% |
| Total Capital Ratio | 11.17% | 17.84% |
| Tier 1 Leverage Ratio | 8.59% | 10.45% |
| Equity / Assets | 7.84% | 17.06% |
Profitability
| Metric | Insouth Bank | Eastern Michigan Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 0.81% | 1.38% |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 10.44% | 8.21% |
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 4.20% | 4.64% |
| Yield on Earning Assets | 6.20% | 5.12% |
| Cost of Funds | 2.01% | 0.52% |
Asset quality
| Metric | Insouth Bank | Eastern Michigan Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Texas Ratio | 24.45% | 2.15% |
| Non-Performing Loan Ratio | 2.53% | 0.62% |
| Non-Performing Asset Ratio | 2.01% | 0.21% |
| Net Charge-Off Ratio | 0.09% | -0.10% |
| ACL / Loans | 1.16% | 1.19% |
Balance sheet
| Metric | Insouth Bank | Eastern Michigan Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | $568,378K | $567,842K |
| Total Deposits | $508,707K | $470,211K |
| Total Loans | $440,680K | $198,111K |
| Total Equity | $44,541K | $96,847K |
| Net Income (quarter) | $1,166K | $1,976K |
Liquidity & funding
| Metric | Insouth Bank | Eastern Michigan Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio | 86.63% | 42.13% |
| Core Deposit Ratio | 91.59% | 99.78% |
| Uninsured Deposit Ratio | — | — |
Identity
| Metric | Insouth Bank | Eastern Michigan Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters City | BROWNSVILLE | CROSWELL |
| Headquarters State | TN | MI |
| Asset Tier | Medium | Medium |
| Charter Class | 0 | 0 |
| Regulator | FED | FED |
| Domestic Branches | 8 | 13 |
| Employees (FTE) | 112 | 82 |
| Established | Jan. 1, 1869, midnight | Dec. 4, 1895, midnight |
About this comparison
All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings — the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of . The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio.
View full Insouth Bank profile | View full Eastern Michigan Bank profile | Browse all bank comparisons