Bank Comparison
Isabella Bank vs Plumas Bank
Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.
vs
9 · 15
winning metrics across 24 comparable rows
Capital adequacy
| Metric | Isabella Bank | Plumas Bank |
|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio | 11.36% | 15.50% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio | 11.36% | 15.50% |
| Total Capital Ratio | 12.24% | 16.71% |
| Tier 1 Leverage Ratio | 8.62% | 11.59% |
| Equity / Assets | 8.35% | 12.60% |
Profitability
| Metric | Isabella Bank | Plumas Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 1.05% | 1.77% |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 12.69% | 14.41% |
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 3.32% | 5.07% |
| Yield on Earning Assets | 4.89% | 5.86% |
| Cost of Funds | 1.63% | 0.85% |
Asset quality
| Metric | Isabella Bank | Plumas Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Texas Ratio | 7.25% | 6.08% |
| Non-Performing Loan Ratio | 0.90% | 1.04% |
| Non-Performing Asset Ratio | 0.64% | 0.72% |
| Net Charge-Off Ratio | 0.07% | 0.06% |
| ACL / Loans | 0.90% | 1.28% |
Balance sheet
| Metric | Isabella Bank | Plumas Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | $2,203M | $2,199M |
| Total Deposits | $1,890M | $1,778M |
| Total Loans | $1,559M | $1,505M |
| Total Equity | $183,968K | $277,145K |
| Net Income (quarter) | $5,754K | $9,906K |
Liquidity & funding
| Metric | Isabella Bank | Plumas Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio | 82.47% | 84.65% |
| Core Deposit Ratio | 92.67% | 92.37% |
| Uninsured Deposit Ratio | 38.50% | 39.01% |
Identity
| Metric | Isabella Bank | Plumas Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters City | MOUNT PLEASANT | QUINCY |
| Headquarters State | MI | CA |
| Asset Tier | Large | Large |
| Charter Class | 0 | 0 |
| Regulator | FED | FED |
| Domestic Branches | 32 | 20 |
| Employees (FTE) | 364 | 232 |
| Established | July 1, 1903, midnight | Dec. 13, 1980, midnight |
About this comparison
All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings — the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of . The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio.
View full Isabella Bank profile | View full Plumas Bank profile | Browse all bank comparisons