Bank Comparison
Johnson Bank vs Cambridge Savings Bank
Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.
vs
21 · 3
winning metrics across 24 comparable rows
Capital adequacy
| Metric | Johnson Bank | Cambridge Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio | 16.04% | 12.85% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio | 16.04% | 12.85% |
| Total Capital Ratio | 17.30% | 13.86% |
| Tier 1 Leverage Ratio | 12.47% | 10.25% |
| Equity / Assets | 12.58% | 10.20% |
Profitability
| Metric | Johnson Bank | Cambridge Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 1.24% | 0.32% |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 10.06% | 3.12% |
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 3.44% | 2.80% |
| Yield on Earning Assets | 5.24% | 5.07% |
| Cost of Funds | 1.98% | 2.46% |
Asset quality
| Metric | Johnson Bank | Cambridge Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Texas Ratio | 1.57% | 9.23% |
| Non-Performing Loan Ratio | 0.28% | 1.19% |
| Non-Performing Asset Ratio | 0.21% | 0.99% |
| Net Charge-Off Ratio | -0.12% | 0.00% |
| ACL / Loans | 1.48% | 0.94% |
Balance sheet
| Metric | Johnson Bank | Cambridge Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | $7,008M | $6,912M |
| Total Deposits | $5,836M | $5,516M |
| Total Loans | $5,288M | $5,729M |
| Total Equity | $881,316K | $704,889K |
| Net Income (quarter) | $21,941K | $5,498K |
Liquidity & funding
| Metric | Johnson Bank | Cambridge Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio | 90.61% | 103.86% |
| Core Deposit Ratio | 92.36% | 93.36% |
| Uninsured Deposit Ratio | 48.91% | 29.16% |
Identity
| Metric | Johnson Bank | Cambridge Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters City | RACINE | CAMBRIDGE |
| Headquarters State | WI | MA |
| Asset Tier | Large | Large |
| Charter Class | 0 | 0 |
| Regulator | FED | FDIC |
| Domestic Branches | 32 | 21 |
| Employees (FTE) | 765 | 495 |
| Established | Nov. 12, 1970, midnight | April 2, 1834, midnight |
About this comparison
All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings — the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of . The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio.
View full Johnson Bank profile | View full Cambridge Savings Bank profile | Browse all bank comparisons