Skip to main content

Bank Comparison

Planters Bank & Trust Company vs Georgia Banking Company

Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.

Planters Bank & Trust Company

RSSD 972648 · INDIANOLA, MS

Full profile →

vs

15 · 9

winning metrics across 24 comparable rows

Georgia Banking Company

RSSD 3016347 · ATLANTA, GA

Full profile →

Capital adequacy

MetricPlanters Bank & Trust CompanyGeorgia Banking Company
CET1 Ratio 15.00% 11.54%
Tier 1 Capital Ratio 15.00% 11.54%
Total Capital Ratio 15.87% 12.74%
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio 10.95% 10.15%
Equity / Assets 11.37% 9.94%

Profitability

MetricPlanters Bank & Trust CompanyGeorgia Banking Company
Return on Assets (ROA) 1.22% 1.32%
Return on Equity (ROE) 12.37% 12.83%
Net Interest Margin (NIM) 3.60% 4.51%
Yield on Earning Assets 5.56% 6.58%
Cost of Funds 2.36% 2.16%

Asset quality

MetricPlanters Bank & Trust CompanyGeorgia Banking Company
Texas Ratio 5.35% 6.39%
Non-Performing Loan Ratio 0.83% 0.76%
Non-Performing Asset Ratio 0.57% 0.65%
Net Charge-Off Ratio -0.03% 0.18%
ACL / Loans 1.11% 1.08%

Balance sheet

MetricPlanters Bank & Trust CompanyGeorgia Banking Company
Total Assets $2,688M $2,675M
Total Deposits $2,283M $2,244M
Total Loans $1,758M $2,279M
Total Equity $305,588K $266,039K
Net Income (quarter) $8,248K $8,405K

Liquidity & funding

MetricPlanters Bank & Trust CompanyGeorgia Banking Company
Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 77.01% 101.57%
Core Deposit Ratio 89.04% 90.50%
Uninsured Deposit Ratio 41.91% 46.87%

Identity

MetricPlanters Bank & Trust CompanyGeorgia Banking Company
Headquarters City INDIANOLA ATLANTA
Headquarters State MS GA
Asset Tier Large Large
Charter Class 0 0
Regulator FDIC FDIC
Domestic Branches 33 9
Employees (FTE) 357 240
Established April 10, 1920, midnight Nov. 1, 2001, midnight

About this comparison

All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings — the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of . The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio.

View full Planters Bank & Trust Company profile  |  View full Georgia Banking Company profile  |  Browse all bank comparisons