Bank Comparison
Waterford Commercial and Savings Bank, the vs Tarboro Savings Bank, Ssb
Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.
vs
17 · 3
winning metrics across 20 comparable rows
Capital adequacy
| Metric | Waterford Commercial and Savings Bank, the | Tarboro Savings Bank, Ssb |
|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio | — | — |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio | — | — |
| Total Capital Ratio | — | — |
| Tier 1 Leverage Ratio | 14.18% | 11.19% |
| Equity / Assets | 13.90% | 11.51% |
Profitability
| Metric | Waterford Commercial and Savings Bank, the | Tarboro Savings Bank, Ssb |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 0.67% | -0.19% |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 4.99% | -1.65% |
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 4.39% | 2.22% |
| Yield on Earning Assets | 5.58% | 5.30% |
| Cost of Funds | 1.32% | 2.84% |
Asset quality
| Metric | Waterford Commercial and Savings Bank, the | Tarboro Savings Bank, Ssb |
|---|---|---|
| Texas Ratio | 1.41% | 5.51% |
| Non-Performing Loan Ratio | 0.00% | 0.65% |
| Non-Performing Asset Ratio | 0.00% | 0.48% |
| Net Charge-Off Ratio | -0.26% | 0.00% |
| ACL / Loans | 0.95% | 0.41% |
Balance sheet
| Metric | Waterford Commercial and Savings Bank, the | Tarboro Savings Bank, Ssb |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | $54,397K | $54,568K |
| Total Deposits | $46,586K | $48,219K |
| Total Loans | $39,441K | $40,354K |
| Total Equity | $7,560K | $6,282K |
| Net Income (quarter) | $94 | $-26 |
Liquidity & funding
| Metric | Waterford Commercial and Savings Bank, the | Tarboro Savings Bank, Ssb |
|---|---|---|
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio | 84.66% | 83.69% |
| Core Deposit Ratio | 95.57% | 84.50% |
| Uninsured Deposit Ratio | — | — |
Identity
| Metric | Waterford Commercial and Savings Bank, the | Tarboro Savings Bank, Ssb |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters City | WATERFORD | TARBORO |
| Headquarters State | OH | NC |
| Asset Tier | Micro | Micro |
| Charter Class | 0 | 0 |
| Regulator | FDIC | FDIC |
| Domestic Branches | 2 | 1 |
| Employees (FTE) | 14 | 7 |
| Established | Jan. 1, 1908, midnight | Jan. 1, 1906, midnight |
About this comparison
All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings — the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of . The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio.
View full Waterford Commercial and Savings Bank, the profile | View full Tarboro Savings Bank, Ssb profile | Browse all bank comparisons