Bank Comparison
Bank of Cleveland vs Piscataqua Savings Bank
Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.
vs
15 · 2
winning metrics across 17 comparable rows
Capital adequacy
| Metric | Bank of Cleveland | Piscataqua Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio | 22.22% | — |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio | 22.22% | — |
| Total Capital Ratio | 23.31% | — |
| Tier 1 Leverage Ratio | 18.15% | 13.22% |
| Equity / Assets | 24.40% | 10.86% |
Profitability
| Metric | Bank of Cleveland | Piscataqua Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 2.89% | 0.36% |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 12.06% | 3.32% |
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 6.87% | 1.58% |
| Yield on Earning Assets | 8.08% | 3.87% |
| Cost of Funds | 1.39% | 2.45% |
Asset quality
| Metric | Bank of Cleveland | Piscataqua Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Texas Ratio | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Non-Performing Loan Ratio | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Non-Performing Asset Ratio | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Net Charge-Off Ratio | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| ACL / Loans | 1.08% | 0.68% |
Balance sheet
| Metric | Bank of Cleveland | Piscataqua Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | $381,174K | $381,255K |
| Total Deposits | $282,118K | $298,911K |
| Total Loans | $287,562K | $203,353K |
| Total Equity | $93,018K | $41,413K |
| Net Income (quarter) | $2,762K | $345 |
Liquidity & funding
| Metric | Bank of Cleveland | Piscataqua Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio | 101.93% | 68.03% |
| Core Deposit Ratio | 93.36% | 82.84% |
| Uninsured Deposit Ratio | — | — |
Identity
| Metric | Bank of Cleveland | Piscataqua Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters City | Cleveland | PORTSMOUTH |
| Headquarters State | TN | NH |
| Asset Tier | Small | Small |
| Charter Class | 0 | 0 |
| Regulator | FDIC | FDIC |
| Domestic Branches | 5 | 1 |
| Employees (FTE) | 54 | 37 |
| Established | May 8, 1987, midnight | Jan. 1, 1877, midnight |
About this comparison
All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings — the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of . The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio.
View full Bank of Cleveland profile | View full Piscataqua Savings Bank profile | Browse all bank comparisons