Bank Comparison
Central National Bank vs Armed Forces Bank, N.A.
Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.
vs
9 · 12
winning metrics across 21 comparable rows
Capital adequacy
| Metric | Central National Bank | Armed Forces Bank, N.A. |
|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio | — | 23.04% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio | — | 23.04% |
| Total Capital Ratio | — | 24.29% |
| Tier 1 Leverage Ratio | 10.81% | 13.69% |
| Equity / Assets | 9.94% | 12.55% |
Profitability
| Metric | Central National Bank | Armed Forces Bank, N.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 1.31% | 1.78% |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 13.45% | 13.84% |
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 3.75% | 3.98% |
| Yield on Earning Assets | 5.41% | 4.94% |
| Cost of Funds | 1.73% | 1.04% |
Asset quality
| Metric | Central National Bank | Armed Forces Bank, N.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Texas Ratio | 5.07% | 9.50% |
| Non-Performing Loan Ratio | 0.93% | 2.16% |
| Non-Performing Asset Ratio | 0.54% | 1.17% |
| Net Charge-Off Ratio | 0.36% | 0.16% |
| ACL / Loans | 1.86% | 1.60% |
Balance sheet
| Metric | Central National Bank | Armed Forces Bank, N.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | $1,376M | $1,439M |
| Total Deposits | $1,189M | $1,237M |
| Total Loans | $781,894K | $781,173K |
| Total Equity | $136,815K | $180,619K |
| Net Income (quarter) | $4,524K | $6,220K |
Liquidity & funding
| Metric | Central National Bank | Armed Forces Bank, N.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio | 65.74% | 63.14% |
| Core Deposit Ratio | 94.94% | 94.34% |
| Uninsured Deposit Ratio | 37.14% | 17.32% |
Identity
| Metric | Central National Bank | Armed Forces Bank, N.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters City | JUNCTION CITY | FORT LEAVENWORTH |
| Headquarters State | KS | KS |
| Asset Tier | Large | Large |
| Charter Class | 4284 | 8796 |
| Regulator | OCC | OCC |
| Domestic Branches | 35 | 15 |
| Employees (FTE) | 264 | 250 |
| Established | Jan. 1, 1884, midnight | Jan. 1, 1907, midnight |
About this comparison
All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings — the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of . The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio.
View full Central National Bank profile | View full Armed Forces Bank, N.A. profile | Browse all bank comparisons