Bank Comparison
Luana Savings Bank vs Omb Bank
Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.
vs
10 · 11
winning metrics across 21 comparable rows
Capital adequacy
| Metric | Luana Savings Bank | Omb Bank |
|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio | — | 9.92% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio | — | 9.92% |
| Total Capital Ratio | — | 11.17% |
| Tier 1 Leverage Ratio | 9.83% | 9.08% |
| Equity / Assets | 9.47% | 8.91% |
Profitability
| Metric | Luana Savings Bank | Omb Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 0.97% | 1.22% |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 10.41% | 13.69% |
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 1.88% | 3.54% |
| Yield on Earning Assets | 4.65% | 6.64% |
| Cost of Funds | 3.06% | 3.34% |
Asset quality
| Metric | Luana Savings Bank | Omb Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Texas Ratio | 0.20% | 6.75% |
| Non-Performing Loan Ratio | 0.02% | 0.52% |
| Non-Performing Asset Ratio | 0.02% | 0.57% |
| Net Charge-Off Ratio | 0.00% | 0.03% |
| ACL / Loans | 1.01% | 1.56% |
Balance sheet
| Metric | Luana Savings Bank | Omb Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | $2,198M | $2,205M |
| Total Deposits | $1,894M | $1,922M |
| Total Loans | $1,801M | $1,947M |
| Total Equity | $208,295K | $196,652K |
| Net Income (quarter) | $5,415K | $6,573K |
Liquidity & funding
| Metric | Luana Savings Bank | Omb Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio | 95.06% | 101.29% |
| Core Deposit Ratio | 93.39% | 82.77% |
| Uninsured Deposit Ratio | 7.55% | 20.43% |
Identity
| Metric | Luana Savings Bank | Omb Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters City | LUANA | SPRINGFIELD |
| Headquarters State | IA | MO |
| Asset Tier | Large | Large |
| Charter Class | 0 | 0 |
| Regulator | FDIC | FED |
| Domestic Branches | 6 | 10 |
| Employees (FTE) | 98 | 240 |
| Established | Aug. 1, 1908, midnight | April 13, 1883, midnight |
About this comparison
All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings — the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of . The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio.
View full Luana Savings Bank profile | View full Omb Bank profile | Browse all bank comparisons