Bank Comparison
Manasquan Bank vs Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (U.S.A.) Limited
Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.
vs
7 · 17
winning metrics across 24 comparable rows
Capital adequacy
| Metric | Manasquan Bank | Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (U.S.A.) Limited |
|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio | 11.13% | 37.46% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio | 11.13% | 37.46% |
| Total Capital Ratio | 12.07% | 37.46% |
| Tier 1 Leverage Ratio | 9.65% | 13.14% |
| Equity / Assets | 9.42% | 13.86% |
Profitability
| Metric | Manasquan Bank | Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (U.S.A.) Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 0.39% | 1.80% |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 4.14% | 13.44% |
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 3.12% | 2.20% |
| Yield on Earning Assets | 5.20% | 3.38% |
| Cost of Funds | 2.24% | 1.44% |
Asset quality
| Metric | Manasquan Bank | Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (U.S.A.) Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Texas Ratio | 9.62% | 0.00% |
| Non-Performing Loan Ratio | 1.17% | 0.00% |
| Non-Performing Asset Ratio | 0.97% | 0.00% |
| Net Charge-Off Ratio | 0.58% | 0.00% |
| ACL / Loans | 0.85% | 0.00% |
Balance sheet
| Metric | Manasquan Bank | Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (U.S.A.) Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | $3,459M | $3,808M |
| Total Deposits | $2,994M | $3,230M |
| Total Loans | $2,888M | $67,726K |
| Total Equity | $325,946K | $527,666K |
| Net Income (quarter) | $3,317K | $18,114K |
Liquidity & funding
| Metric | Manasquan Bank | Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (U.S.A.) Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio | 96.44% | 2.10% |
| Core Deposit Ratio | 86.65% | 100.00% |
| Uninsured Deposit Ratio | 30.98% | 92.30% |
Identity
| Metric | Manasquan Bank | Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (U.S.A.) Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters City | WALL TOWNSHIP | HOBOKEN |
| Headquarters State | NJ | NJ |
| Asset Tier | Large | Large |
| Charter Class | 0 | 0 |
| Regulator | FDIC | FDIC |
| Domestic Branches | 15 | 1 |
| Employees (FTE) | 262 | 256 |
| Established | Jan. 1, 1874, midnight | Sept. 21, 1987, midnight |
About this comparison
All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings — the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of . The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio.
View full Manasquan Bank profile | View full Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank (U.S.A.) Limited profile | Browse all bank comparisons