Bank Comparison
Mid America Bank vs Saint Louis Bank
Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.
vs
15 · 5
winning metrics across 20 comparable rows
Capital adequacy
| Metric | Mid America Bank | Saint Louis Bank |
|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio | — | 9.97% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio | — | 9.97% |
| Total Capital Ratio | — | 11.14% |
| Tier 1 Leverage Ratio | 10.83% | 8.60% |
| Equity / Assets | 11.10% | 8.04% |
Profitability
| Metric | Mid America Bank | Saint Louis Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 2.21% | 0.95% |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 19.22% | 11.54% |
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 4.58% | 3.32% |
| Yield on Earning Assets | 6.10% | 5.73% |
| Cost of Funds | 1.65% | 2.71% |
Asset quality
| Metric | Mid America Bank | Saint Louis Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Texas Ratio | 1.19% | 20.20% |
| Non-Performing Loan Ratio | 0.19% | 2.04% |
| Non-Performing Asset Ratio | 0.13% | 1.72% |
| Net Charge-Off Ratio | 0.00% | -0.03% |
| ACL / Loans | 1.09% | 1.24% |
Balance sheet
| Metric | Mid America Bank | Saint Louis Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | $1,194M | $1,177M |
| Total Deposits | $1,049M | $1,063M |
| Total Loans | $809,013K | $898,320K |
| Total Equity | $132,563K | $94,684K |
| Net Income (quarter) | $6,323K | $2,719K |
Liquidity & funding
| Metric | Mid America Bank | Saint Louis Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio | 77.11% | 84.43% |
| Core Deposit Ratio | 93.13% | 96.73% |
| Uninsured Deposit Ratio | — | 22.09% |
Identity
| Metric | Mid America Bank | Saint Louis Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters City | LINN | SAINT LOUIS |
| Headquarters State | MO | MO |
| Asset Tier | Large | Large |
| Charter Class | 0 | 0 |
| Regulator | FDIC | FDIC |
| Domestic Branches | 11 | 2 |
| Employees (FTE) | 145 | 63 |
| Established | April 12, 1914, midnight | June 6, 2005, midnight |
About this comparison
All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings — the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of . The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio.
View full Mid America Bank profile | View full Saint Louis Bank profile | Browse all bank comparisons