Skip to main content

Bank Comparison

Charles River Bank vs New Valley Bank & Trust

Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.

Charles River Bank

RSSD 947776 · Medway, MA

Full profile →

vs

12 · 4

winning metrics across 16 scored rows

New Valley Bank & Trust

RSSD 5316920 · Springfield, MA

Full profile →

Compare a different pair

Search for a bank in each box, choose it from the list, then press Compare.

Capital adequacy

Metric Charles River Bank New Valley Bank & Trust
CET1 Ratio 12.46% 10.79%
Tier 1 Capital Ratio 12.46% 10.79%
Total Capital Ratio 13.21% 12.04%
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio 7.93% 7.45%
Equity / Assets 6.43% 7.11%

Profitability

Metric Charles River Bank New Valley Bank & Trust
Return on Assets (ROA) 0.46% -0.24%
Return on Equity (ROE) 7.34% -3.43%
Net Interest Margin (NIM) 3.26% 2.55%
Yield on Earning Assets 4.76% 4.73%
Cost of Funds 1.55% 2.48%

Asset quality

Metric Charles River Bank New Valley Bank & Trust
Texas Ratio 4.72% 18.23%
Non-Performing Loan Ratio 0.47% 2.34%
Non-Performing Asset Ratio 0.32% 1.54%
Net Charge-Off Ratio 0.00% -0.46%
ACL / Loans 0.65% 2.05%

Balance sheet

Metric Charles River Bank New Valley Bank & Trust
Total Assets $336.1M $385.0M
Total Deposits $312.6M $321.4M
Total Loans $232.3M $253.3M
Total Equity $21.6M $27.4M
Net Income (quarter) $393K ($235K)

Liquidity & funding

Metric Charles River Bank New Valley Bank & Trust
Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 74.31% 78.81%
Core Deposit Ratio 82.49% 84.70%
Uninsured Deposit Ratio — —

Identity

Metric Charles River Bank New Valley Bank & Trust
Headquarters City Medway Springfield
Headquarters State MA MA
Asset Tier $100M to $1B in assets $100M to $1B in assets
Regulator FED FDIC
Domestic Branches 4 3
Employees (FTE) 48 36
Established January 1, 1915 May 30, 2019

About this comparison

All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings, the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of June 30, 2026. The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio. Size and identity rows (assets, deposits, loans, equity, branches, employees) are shown for context and are not scored, and two values that match at the precision shown count as a tie.

View full Charles River Bank profile  |  View full New Valley Bank & Trust profile  |  Browse all bank comparisons