Bank Comparison
Evabank vs The Bank, N.A.
Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.
vs
5 · 8
winning metrics across 13 scored rows
Compare a different pair
Search for a bank in each box, choose it from the list, then press Compare.
Capital adequacy
| Metric | Evabank | The Bank, N.A. |
|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio | — | — |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio | — | — |
| Total Capital Ratio | — | — |
| Tier 1 Leverage Ratio | 27.84% | 10.85% |
| Equity / Assets | 27.98% | 8.89% |
Profitability
| Metric | Evabank | The Bank, N.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 1.81% | 1.91% |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 6.39% | 21.70% |
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 6.11% | 4.30% |
| Yield on Earning Assets | 8.24% | 5.60% |
| Cost of Funds | 2.97% | 1.34% |
Asset quality
| Metric | Evabank | The Bank, N.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Texas Ratio | 17.67% | 9.01% |
| Non-Performing Loan Ratio | 6.20% | 1.25% |
| Non-Performing Asset Ratio | 5.32% | 0.85% |
| Net Charge-Off Ratio | 2.08% | 0.01% |
| ACL / Loans | 2.59% | 1.27% |
Balance sheet
| Metric | Evabank | The Bank, N.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | $487.8M | $488.1M |
| Total Deposits | $340.4M | $442.8M |
| Total Loans | $398.7M | $331.1M |
| Total Equity | $136.5M | $43.4M |
| Net Income (quarter) | $2.2M | $2.3M |
Liquidity & funding
| Metric | Evabank | The Bank, N.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio | 117.13% | 74.78% |
| Core Deposit Ratio | 79.72% | 93.71% |
| Uninsured Deposit Ratio | — | — |
Identity
| Metric | Evabank | The Bank, N.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters City | Eva | McAlester |
| Headquarters State | AL | OK |
| Asset Tier | $100M to $1B in assets | $100M to $1B in assets |
| Regulator | FDIC | OCC |
| Domestic Branches | 6 | 6 |
| Employees (FTE) | 66 | 86 |
| Established | October 13, 1986 | May 17, 1927 |
About this comparison
All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings, the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of September 30, 2026. The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio. Size and identity rows (assets, deposits, loans, equity, branches, employees) are shown for context and are not scored, and two values that match at the precision shown count as a tie.
View full Evabank profile | View full The Bank, N.A. profile | Browse all bank comparisons