Skip to main content

Bank Comparison

Hills Bank and Trust Company vs Principal Bank

Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.

Hills Bank and Trust Company

RSSD 731247 · Hills, IA

Full profile →

vs

9 · 5

winning metrics across 14 scored rows

Principal Bank

RSSD 2654911 · Des Moines, IA

Full profile →

Compare a different pair

Search for a bank in each box, choose it from the list, then press Compare.

Capital adequacy

Metric Hills Bank and Trust Company Principal Bank
CET1 Ratio — 14.91%
Tier 1 Capital Ratio — 14.91%
Total Capital Ratio — 15.07%
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio 13.36% 7.13%
Equity / Assets 13.03% 5.02%

Profitability

Metric Hills Bank and Trust Company Principal Bank
Return on Assets (ROA) 2.26% 1.59%
Return on Equity (ROE) 17.42% 33.03%
Net Interest Margin (NIM) 3.87% 2.35%
Yield on Earning Assets 5.49% 3.99%
Cost of Funds 1.83% 1.77%

Asset quality

Metric Hills Bank and Trust Company Principal Bank
Texas Ratio 2.21% 2.62%
Non-Performing Loan Ratio 0.82% 0.44%
Non-Performing Asset Ratio 0.63% 0.13%
Net Charge-Off Ratio -0.07% 0.00%
ACL / Loans 1.50% 0.25%

Balance sheet

Metric Hills Bank and Trust Company Principal Bank
Total Assets $4.79B $9.84B
Total Deposits $3.53B $9.26B
Total Loans $3.66B $2.99B
Total Equity $624.7M $493.9M
Net Income (quarter) $26.6M $40.3M

Liquidity & funding

Metric Hills Bank and Trust Company Principal Bank
Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 103.77% 32.32%
Core Deposit Ratio 91.62% 98.89%
Uninsured Deposit Ratio 23.81% 45.59%

Identity

Metric Hills Bank and Trust Company Principal Bank
Headquarters City Hills Des Moines
Headquarters State IA IA
Asset Tier $1B to $10B in assets $1B to $10B in assets
Regulator FDIC OCC
Domestic Branches 21 1
Employees (FTE) 497 627
Established January 1, 1904 February 12, 1998

About this comparison

All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings, the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of June 30, 2026. The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio. Size and identity rows (assets, deposits, loans, equity, branches, employees) are shown for context and are not scored, and two values that match at the precision shown count as a tie.

View full Hills Bank and Trust Company profile  |  View full Principal Bank profile  |  Browse all bank comparisons