Skip to main content

Bank Comparison

Three Rivers Bank of Montana vs Charter Bank

Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.

Three Rivers Bank of Montana

RSSD 610557 · Kalispell, MT

Full profile →

vs

8 · 5

winning metrics across 13 scored rows

Charter Bank

RSSD 814458 · Corpus Christi, TX

Full profile →

Compare a different pair

Search for a bank in each box, choose it from the list, then press Compare.

Capital adequacy

Metric Three Rivers Bank of Montana Charter Bank
CET1 Ratio — 17.52%
Tier 1 Capital Ratio — 17.52%
Total Capital Ratio — 18.78%
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio 11.72% 11.30%
Equity / Assets 11.51% 8.33%

Profitability

Metric Three Rivers Bank of Montana Charter Bank
Return on Assets (ROA) 1.51% 2.09%
Return on Equity (ROE) 13.60% 26.88%
Net Interest Margin (NIM) 5.36% 5.52%
Yield on Earning Assets 6.87% 6.73%
Cost of Funds 1.57% 1.34%

Asset quality

Metric Three Rivers Bank of Montana Charter Bank
Texas Ratio 6.34% 16.75%
Non-Performing Loan Ratio 0.93% 2.78%
Non-Performing Asset Ratio 0.78% 1.59%
Net Charge-Off Ratio 0.03% 0.25%
ACL / Loans 1.03% 2.04%

Balance sheet

Metric Three Rivers Bank of Montana Charter Bank
Total Assets $293.1M $292.3M
Total Deposits $257.9M $265.2M
Total Loans $247.6M $167.5M
Total Equity $33.7M $24.3M
Net Income (quarter) $1.1M $1.6M

Liquidity & funding

Metric Three Rivers Bank of Montana Charter Bank
Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 96.01% 63.17%
Core Deposit Ratio 94.34% 89.04%
Uninsured Deposit Ratio — —

Identity

Metric Three Rivers Bank of Montana Charter Bank
Headquarters City Kalispell Corpus Christi
Headquarters State MT TX
Asset Tier $100M to $1B in assets $100M to $1B in assets
Regulator FDIC FDIC
Domestic Branches 3 4
Employees (FTE) 55 50
Established May 1, 1974 December 14, 1962

About this comparison

All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings, the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of June 30, 2026. The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio. Size and identity rows (assets, deposits, loans, equity, branches, employees) are shown for context and are not scored, and two values that match at the precision shown count as a tie.

View full Three Rivers Bank of Montana profile  |  View full Charter Bank profile  |  Browse all bank comparisons