Skip to main content

Bank Comparison

United Southern Bank vs The Hocking Valley Bank

Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.

United Southern Bank

RSSD 110945 · Hopkinsville, KY

Full profile →

vs

7 · 6

winning metrics across 13 scored rows

The Hocking Valley Bank

RSSD 230610 · Athens, OH

Full profile →

Compare a different pair

Search for a bank in each box, choose it from the list, then press Compare.

Capital adequacy

Metric United Southern Bank The Hocking Valley Bank
CET1 Ratio — —
Tier 1 Capital Ratio — —
Total Capital Ratio — —
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio 12.66% 11.82%
Equity / Assets 12.09% 10.99%

Profitability

Metric United Southern Bank The Hocking Valley Bank
Return on Assets (ROA) 1.53% 1.54%
Return on Equity (ROE) 12.94% 14.31%
Net Interest Margin (NIM) 4.47% 3.95%
Yield on Earning Assets 6.10% 4.94%
Cost of Funds 1.76% 1.08%

Asset quality

Metric United Southern Bank The Hocking Valley Bank
Texas Ratio 2.37% 4.48%
Non-Performing Loan Ratio 0.39% 0.73%
Non-Performing Asset Ratio 0.31% 0.52%
Net Charge-Off Ratio 0.03% 0.00%
ACL / Loans 1.19% 1.21%

Balance sheet

Metric United Southern Bank The Hocking Valley Bank
Total Assets $353.7M $354.9M
Total Deposits $308.3M $312.7M
Total Loans $281.2M $212.9M
Total Equity $42.8M $39.0M
Net Income (quarter) $1.4M $1.4M

Liquidity & funding

Metric United Southern Bank The Hocking Valley Bank
Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 91.21% 68.09%
Core Deposit Ratio 87.29% 88.58%
Uninsured Deposit Ratio — —

Identity

Metric United Southern Bank The Hocking Valley Bank
Headquarters City Hopkinsville Athens
Headquarters State KY OH
Asset Tier $100M to $1B in assets $100M to $1B in assets
Regulator FED FED
Domestic Branches 7 5
Employees (FTE) 66 38
Established June 22, 1922 February 12, 1919

About this comparison

All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings, the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of June 30, 2026. The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio. Size and identity rows (assets, deposits, loans, equity, branches, employees) are shown for context and are not scored, and two values that match at the precision shown count as a tie.

View full United Southern Bank profile  |  View full The Hocking Valley Bank profile  |  Browse all bank comparisons