Bank Comparison
University Bank vs Midwest Bank
Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.
vs
7 · 6
winning metrics across 14 scored rows (1 tied)
Compare a different pair
Search for a bank in each box, choose it from the list, then press Compare.
Capital adequacy
| Metric | University Bank | Midwest Bank |
|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio | — | — |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio | — | — |
| Total Capital Ratio | — | — |
| Tier 1 Leverage Ratio | 10.08% | 9.40% |
| Equity / Assets | 9.57% | 8.83% |
Profitability
| Metric | University Bank | Midwest Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Assets (ROA) | 1.47% | 1.20% |
| Return on Equity (ROE) | 15.27% | 14.06% |
| Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 4.35% | 3.71% |
| Yield on Earning Assets | 6.42% | 6.00% |
| Cost of Funds | 2.17% | 2.42% |
Asset quality
| Metric | University Bank | Midwest Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Texas Ratio | 5.07% | 3.33% |
| Non-Performing Loan Ratio | 0.51% | 0.32% |
| Non-Performing Asset Ratio | 0.50% | 0.24% |
| Net Charge-Off Ratio | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| ACL / Loans | 0.42% | 1.58% |
Balance sheet
| Metric | University Bank | Midwest Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | $1.24B | $1.24B |
| Total Deposits | $1.06B | $1.04B |
| Total Loans | $1.09B | $912.3M |
| Total Equity | $118.9M | $109.3M |
| Net Income (quarter) | $4.4M | $3.8M |
Liquidity & funding
| Metric | University Bank | Midwest Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio | 103.16% | 87.62% |
| Core Deposit Ratio | 72.07% | 83.06% |
| Uninsured Deposit Ratio | 70.16% | 34.64% |
Identity
| Metric | University Bank | Midwest Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters City | Ann Arbor | Pierce |
| Headquarters State | MI | NE |
| Asset Tier | $1B to $10B in assets | $1B to $10B in assets |
| Regulator | FDIC | FED |
| Domestic Branches | 2 | 11 |
| Employees (FTE) | 543 | 176 |
| Established | May 8, 1908 | January 1, 1882 |
About this comparison
All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings, the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of June 30, 2026. The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio. Size and identity rows (assets, deposits, loans, equity, branches, employees) are shown for context and are not scored, and two values that match at the precision shown count as a tie.
View full University Bank profile | View full Midwest Bank profile | Browse all bank comparisons