Skip to main content

Bank Comparison

Security Bank Minnesota vs Bank of Moundville

Side-by-side regulatory financials for the latest quarter on file with the FFIEC.

Security Bank Minnesota

RSSD 295057 · Albert Lea, MN

Full profile →

vs

11 · 2

winning metrics across 13 scored rows

Bank of Moundville

RSSD 586335 · Moundville, AL

Full profile →

Compare a different pair

Search for a bank in each box, choose it from the list, then press Compare.

Capital adequacy

Metric Security Bank Minnesota Bank of Moundville
CET1 Ratio 14.80% —
Tier 1 Capital Ratio 14.80% —
Total Capital Ratio 16.05% —
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio 10.90% 15.10%
Equity / Assets 10.89% 11.20%

Profitability

Metric Security Bank Minnesota Bank of Moundville
Return on Assets (ROA) 2.67% 0.39%
Return on Equity (ROE) 25.75% 3.44%
Net Interest Margin (NIM) 5.18% 2.62%
Yield on Earning Assets 6.58% 4.39%
Cost of Funds 1.57% 1.95%

Asset quality

Metric Security Bank Minnesota Bank of Moundville
Texas Ratio 8.73% 19.08%
Non-Performing Loan Ratio 1.45% 5.45%
Non-Performing Asset Ratio 1.07% 2.22%
Net Charge-Off Ratio -0.48% 0.05%
ACL / Loans 1.86% 1.02%

Balance sheet

Metric Security Bank Minnesota Bank of Moundville
Total Assets $140.8M $144.6M
Total Deposits $121.4M $127.8M
Total Loans $103.6M $58.7M
Total Equity $15.3M $16.2M
Net Income (quarter) $965K $139K

Liquidity & funding

Metric Security Bank Minnesota Bank of Moundville
Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 85.38% 45.96%
Core Deposit Ratio 94.88% 83.19%
Uninsured Deposit Ratio — —

Identity

Metric Security Bank Minnesota Bank of Moundville
Headquarters City Albert Lea Moundville
Headquarters State MN AL
Asset Tier $100M to $1B in assets $100M to $1B in assets
Regulator FDIC FDIC
Domestic Branches 3 1
Employees (FTE) 23 14
Established January 1, 1906 September 17, 1907

About this comparison

All metrics are sourced from FFIEC call report filings, the public regulatory financial reports every FDIC-insured US bank files quarterly. Both banks are reported as of September 30, 2026. The "winner" highlight is determined by the supervisory direction convention: higher is better for capital and profitability metrics; lower is better for risk metrics like Texas Ratio and uninsured-deposit ratio. Size and identity rows (assets, deposits, loans, equity, branches, employees) are shown for context and are not scored, and two values that match at the precision shown count as a tie.

View full Security Bank Minnesota profile  |  View full Bank of Moundville profile  |  Browse all bank comparisons